Book TV, April 8, 2012

Book TV interviewed Judith Reisman about her book, "Sexual Sabotage," which takes a critical look at the work of biologist Alfred Kinsey. This interview was recorded at Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia.

In this groundbreaking guide, you'll learn how to protect and prevent your children from viewing some of the most vile and horrific images ever produced by mankind. Using research from incredible experts and plainly describing pornography's effects, The Guardians provides you with powerful tools to teach children to avoid and, if necessary, recover from pornography addiction. Pornography can be one of the most damaging and addictive influences ever encountered. The Guardians also profiles and gives strategies of pedophiles.

Written by Mary Muller. Visit the website: theguardiansofinnocence.com

The Arena, March 7, 2012

Sun News Networks' Michael Coren interviews Judith Reisman on The Arena.

By David Kupelian
WorldNetDaily, March 6, 2012

Warning: The following column contains sexually explicit language.

There's a new form of Christianity sweeping the U.S. Its main focus: sex.

Don't be surprised. We already have a Christian denomination catering to every other worldview, comfort zone and obsession, so why not sex? As I said in "The Marketing of Evil":

"No matter what kind of person you are, a form of Christianity has evolved just for you. There's a politically liberal Christianity and a politically conservative Christianity. There's an acutely activist Christianity and an utterly apolitical Christianity, a Christianity that holds up a high standard of ethical behavior and service, and a Christianity for which both personal ethics and good works are irrelevant. There's a raucous, intensely emotional Christianity drenched in high-voltage music, and there's a quiet, contemplative Christianity. There's a loving Christianity and a hateful, racist Christianity, a Christianity that honors Jews as God's chosen people and a Christianity that maligns Jews as Satan's children."

So, it was just a matter of time before we got a version of Christianity for people obsessed with sex.

[Picture: Pastor Mark Driscoll]

And while there is a surprising number of preachers, teachers and Christian websites today whose main focus is sex, the most prominent is Mark Driscoll, founding pastor of the wildly popular Seattle mega-church Mars Hill Church. According to Mars Hill's website, Driscoll's mostly youthful flock has grown from a handful of people in a home Bible study to over 19,000 people meeting across 14 locations in four states.

"One of the world's most-downloaded and quoted pastors," says Driscoll's official bio, "his audience - fans and critics alike - spans the theological and cultural left and right. He was also named one of the '25 Most Influential Pastors of the Past 25 Years' by Preaching magazine, and his sermons are consistently No. 1 on iTunes each week for Religion & Spirituality with over 10 million of downloads each year."

By the way, as runner-up for top mega-church pastor in "The Church of Sex," I'd nominate Ed Young, senior pastor of Dallas-based Fellowship Church, who recently staged "a 24-hour bed-in with his wife atop his church," a stunt designed to publicize his just-released New York Times best-seller, "Sexperiment: 7 Days to Lasting Intimacy With Your Spouse."

But back to Driscoll: I have nothing personal against this popular, hip, tough-talking young pastor in blue jeans, and I totally understand the appeal of his blunt, masculine, passionate style - a refreshing respite from all the stuffy, pretentious and cowardly pastors out there.

However, let's just state the obvious: Mark Driscoll is utterly obsessed with sex.

He tells, for instance, the following story of one female member of his congregation who - and I quote - "brought her husband to Christ" by giving him oral sex, in accord with Driscoll's specific pastoral advice to her. Here's how Driscoll, during a Nov. 18, 2007, sermon in Edinburgh, Scotland, described this particular husband's "conversion":

She [the wife] says, "I've never performed oral sex on my husband. I've refused to." I said, "You need to go home and tell your husband that you've met Jesus and you've been studying the Bible, and that you're convicted of a terrible sin in your life. And then you need to drop his trousers, and you need to serve your husband. And when he asks why, say, 'Because I'm a repentant woman. God has changed my heart and I'm supposed to be a biblical wife.'" She says, "Really?" I said, "Yeah. First Peter 3 says if your husband is an unbeliever to serve him with deeds of kindness." [Laughter from audience] How many men would agree, that is a deed of kindness. He doesn't want tracts. Those won't do anything. What we're talking about here could really help.

Really, people? Is this what we now stoop to in our efforts to make the magnificent Christian faith - the moral foundation of Western civilization - more appealing to a rudderless, confused and sex-drenched generation? Is this what now passes for pastoral counseling and preaching the Bible? I call it abuse and exploitation. I would even call it blasphemy ("... tell your husband that you've met Jesus ... And then you need to drop his trousers ...").

Driscoll was "preaching" the Song of Solomon, which he has said repeatedly is his favorite part of the Bible and about which he preaches often. It's also a major focus of "Real Marriage," his brand-new No. 1 New York Times best-seller - which is mostly about sex - co-authored with his wife, Grace.

For Driscoll, the Song of Solomon amounts to a soft-porn sex manual, which inspires him to admonish women - those who aspire to be "biblical wives" - to awaken their husbands each morning by sexually servicing them in the same way the aforementioned wife "converted" her husband "to Christ." (Actually, I'm not really too sure she converted him to a deep Christian faith, but no doubt he was converted into an enthusiastic member of Driscoll's fast-growing church.)

To his credit, Driscoll condemns fornication, adultery and homosexuality. But for married folks, Driscoll - citing his chief inspiration Solomon, who had 700 wives - promotes sex toys, imaginary sexual role-playing, cybersex, what used to be called "sodomy" (both oral and anal) and wives becoming strippers for their husbands.

In fact, the wives-should-become-strippers teaching is not only in the Bible, gushes the enthusiastic Driscoll, it's in his favorite part of the Holy Scriptures.

"This is my favorite chapter in the whole Bible!" Driscoll exclaimed during the same 2007 sermon. "I believe in the resurrection of Jesus. It's great too. But this is an amazing chapter of the Bible: [Song of Solomon] Chapter 6 verse 13. It's awesome. It's awesome. ... Now, what do you think the dance of mah haneim is? It's an ancient strip tease. Stripping is biblical. You're welcome. [Laughter from audience] It's biblical."

I am not a Bible scholar, far from it. But it's fair to say the Song of Solomon (or Song of Songs) - a short love poem of only eight chapters - is probably the most controversial book in the Bible. It is never quoted in the New Testament. Because of its often erotic language, "ancient Jews and Christians alike rejected its literal interpretation and allegorized it," explains the editor's note in my King James Bible: "For the Jews, it referred to God's dealings with his bride, Israel. The early Christians saw it as representing the relationship between Christ and His bride, the Church." This spiritual interpretation pretty much held sway for the first 19 centuries after Christ.

But in modern times, of course, we like to think we understand such things much better than those ignorant, superstitious, early Christians who knew Jesus and the apostles. Kind of like the way today's judges see things in the U.S. Constitution - gay marriage, abortion, banishing the Ten Commandments from courthouses - that jurists in all previous generations somehow missed.

In any event, however you interpret the Song of Solomon, it's undeniable that weird and sometimes disastrous things happen when you base your worldview and ministry on one or two allegorical and controversial scripture passages. I mean, check out this YouTube video of a room full of "Christian worshipers" ecstatically handling multiple poisonous snakes. That's right, there are some churches, mostly in the Southeastern U.S., that believe handling venomous snakes and drinking poison are an important biblical test and proof of their faith. Why? Because in the Gospel according to Mark, Jesus said: "And these signs will follow those who believe: In My name they will cast out demons; they will speak with new tongues; they will take up serpents; and if they drink anything deadly, it will by no means hurt them; they will lay hands on the sick, and they will recover" (Mark 16:17-18).

Common sense tells us - however we interpret Jesus' actual meaning - that He didn't intend for the faithful to "tempt God" by drinking strychnine and strutting around on stage with rattlers and cottonmouths, practices that every year result in one or more deaths being reported from these churches. But to proponents of snake-handling and poison-drinking, "it's biblical."

In the same way, common sense tells us God did not create women - including married women - to have to compulsively service the needs of oversexed, insecure, angry, egotistical men at all hours of the day and night. And women definitely shouldn't be psychologically manipulated by authority figures into believing they are disobeying God, Jesus and the Bible if they don't become sexual Stepford wives.

Which brings me to this question:

Why has Liberty University - a great Christian college, and one of the few schools in the nation that doesn't infect students with a highly sexualized culture the moment they set foot on campus - agreed to bring Driscoll to its campus in Lynchburg, Va., next month to teach and preach - twice - to all the young Christian students entrusted to that school's care?

Are the students' parents cool with making their kids a captive audience for Driscoll's sex-book tour? And what are the decision-makers at Liberty thinking? It's not as though I'm the first person to point out Driscoll's weird overemphasis on sex. The Christian blogosphere has long been fired up over Driscoll. The Baptist Press reported that a major Christian radio network, the Bott Radio Network, canceled Driscoll because of his over-sexed sermons. Even a recent Seattle TV news story about a controversy at Mars Hill Church revolves around - you'll never guess - sex.

Or check this out: Driscoll tells his congregation he has spiritual visions - which he calls a divine "gift of discernment" - but guess what he spiritually discerns with this sixth sense? Right. As this rather creepy YouTube video reveals, Driscoll has detailed and graphic visions of sexual sins involving his flock, including (in this particular clip) molestation and adultery.

Or how about this story Driscoll told during the same sermon from which I've been quoting:

We were in a grocery store recently, and my wife and I were holding hands and just, you know, shopping. I said, "Why don't you walk ahead of me for awhile." She said, "What for?" I said, "I just want to watch your butt for a while." She said, "Watch my butt?" I said, "Yeah, I like your butt. I like you and I like walking with you. But I'd like to watch your butt for a while, at least through the vegetable section. I want to watch your butt." [Laughter] ... Let her know.

Supporters of Mark Driscoll (including the decision-makers at Liberty University), it's time to wake up. This is not normal. Asking your wife to walk ahead of you in public so you can ogle her rear end is not normal. Having mystical visions of parishioners in sex acts is not normal. Counseling female members of your church to bring their husbands to Jesus through sex acts - that's not normal. Being pastor of one of the fastest-growing mega-churches in the country and announcing that, out of the entire transcendent Bible - which holds the secrets to heaven and hell and eternal happiness or eternal darkness - your favorite part is about stripping?

That's not normal.

Modesty, moderation, self-denial, humility, patient endurance - remember that old stuff? Those are the spiritual qualities of a Christian, which are consistently extolled throughout the entire New Testament. "For to be carnally minded is death," warns Paul; "but to be spiritually minded is life and peace" (Romans 8:6 KJV). The apostles constantly admonish believers not to get too caught up with "the lusts of the flesh."

In "real marriage" - that is, a marriage made in heaven between sincere and spiritually seeking men and women - wives actually appreciate a little nobility, patience and self-restraint on the part of their husbands. Without the manly virtue of self-control and even a little self-denial in their relationship, women can feel trapped - like they have no choice but to become seductive sexpots to keep their husband happy. And if perchance this creates conflict within her own conscience - conflict with a part of her that is not so sensuous, but more angelic and childlike and innocent - her husband has no clue what is happening. But she suffers the conflict nevertheless, perhaps dealing with it by pleasing him more and more, in the vain hope it will relieve her conflict. It doesn't.

Friends, one of life's great challenges for fallen, broken beings like each of us is that we somehow, through God's grace, eventually rise above all the various temptations and pulls of "the world" and live solely unto Him. It would really be nice if our pastors and other spiritual authorities, who claim to represent God, would exemplify and exhort us along this high road - rather than lead us in the opposite direction.

By Michael Carl
WorldNetDaily, March 6, 2012

Controversial biologist Alfred Kinsey's sex research again is coming under fire from lawmakers and social analysts.

As usual, the mainstream press all but ignores the attacks.

Some of the attacks on Kinsey recently came from Minnesota State Rep. Glenn Gruenhagen. He says his comments were made in a couple of places.

"Kinsey came up, somebody asked a question. It was about education at a forum or something. I responded that I have strong reservations about Kinsey's research," Gruenhagen said.

"I also have brought up the fraudulent basis for Kinsey's research at some House committee meetings," Gruenhagen said.

"It just came up in relation to and in committee reports in relation to the sex education in public schools and how the Kinsey institute provides information to SEICUS," Gruenhagen said.

SEICUS is the Sex Education Information Council in the U. S. and they in turn send information to our colleges and universities to educate our sex ed teachers in our public schools," Gruenhagen said.

Gruenhagen says he opposes the popular trend toward "safe sex" because ultimately, that's a misleading term.

"Obviously I oppose the Kinsey-based philosophy of the safer sex approach which is an oxymoron. I also oppose the fraudulent basis of the Kinsey research," Gruenhagen said.

"We're basing our sex education programs in our schools based on fraudulent research. One of his fanatical disciples is Hugh Hefner," Gruenhagen said.

Gruenhagen also voiced his opposition to Kinsey during a legislative hearing on House Bill 853, a crime prevention bill. Sally Jo Sorensen's article in the American Independent reports that after a presentation on money being appropriated to fight sex trafficking, Gruenhagen spoke up.

"I would make this comment. You know, I've been active ... in jail ministry and I've seen some of the mess that you're talking about, okay. And the perversions amid the things that are being done to our young people," Gruenhagen said.

"I've done quite a bit of laymen's study on this. One of the things I would mention is that we need to destroy the so-called research basis for the justification of what's going on in our culture and society with our young people, or the porn industry or whatever," Gruenhagen said.

Gruenhagen points the finger squarely at the people in our culture who still defer to Kinsey's reports. He says the sex trade and pervasive perversion are the direct fallout from Kinsey.

"And that is Dr. Alfred Kinsey's work, okay? He published the Male and Female Report[s] in 1948 and 1956. That research is filled with fraud and lies. That research provided a so-called justification for sex with children down under the age of five years old," Gruenhagen said.

"It is fraudulent, it is a lie, and yet the Kinsey Institute out of Bloomington, Ind., continues to publish and promote their filth into our government and into our sex education programs in our public schools. Do the research, ok? We need to destroy his research," Gruenhagen said.

Social commentator Michelle Laque Johnson says in her report in "Reflections" that there is a link between Obamacare's funding to treat sexually transmitted diseases and provide contraception and Kinsey's research.

While Gruenhagen says the Kinsey comments didn't necessarily come up in relation to Obamacare, social analyst and law professor Dr. Judith Reisman says that Kinsey's research and Obamacare are complementary of one another.

Her books, including "Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences" and "Sexual Sabotage," show that Kinsey's research was based on "illegal sexual experimentation on several hundred young children."

"Kinsey's research is an historic fit with all Obamacare that legitimizes sexual 'rights', like abortion, sex education, homosexual, bisexual, and transgender economic and legal 'rights,' and etc.," Reisman said.

"More perverts will be paid to sexually traumatize all our children and to induce sexual predation and addiction in large numbers. Hence the need for government sexually transmitted disease services, such as abortions, condoms, etc, for our youngsters, Ah, the benefits of Obamacare," Reisman said.

Fighting Obamacare is one of Gruenhagen's missions in this legislative session. He says he's filed several bills to deal with the various problems Obamacare is presenting to the state of Minnesota.

"I have eight bills that deal with healthcare reform and trying to negate aspects of Obamacare," Gruenhagen says, adding that his desire is to eliminate as much government involvement in health care as possible.

Even with Gruenhagen's legislative effort and Reisman's research, Kinsey's surveys have permeated academia and politics. However, there is a group of lawmakers from around the country that are trying to reverse the process.

Reisman points to a paper issued by a group called the American Legislative Exchange Council. The 2,400 member ALEC group issued a report called, "Restoring Legal Protections for Women And Children: A Historical Analysis of The States Criminal Codes."

The report takes direct aim at what it says is Kinsey's "junk science," saying that Kinsey's research is a major cause of a breakdown in morality and is the catalyst fueling the homosexual marriage effort.

The report also says that some of the uses of Kinsey's data have risen to the level of criminal offenses.

"The evidence presented in this State Factor reveals compelling evidence of illegal and criminal acts masquerading as science taken from Kinsey's confessions in his own 'Reports' (1948-1953)," the introduction to the report said.

"Dr. Alfred Kinsey was a 'sexual revolutionary' and his 'Kinsey Reports' are junk science," the introduction said.

The report includes a comment from Notre Dame Law School professor Dr. Charles Rice. Rice says Kinsey's "facts" are at best, misleading.

"They're contrived, ideologically driven and misleading. Any judge, legislator or other public official who gives credence to that research is guilty of malpractice and dereliction of duty," Rice said in the report.

California State Sen. Ray Haynes wrote the introduction to the ALEC report. The authors of the report say that some of Haynes' introduction has been omitted when the report has been discussed in legislatures and forums debating homosexual marriage.

"Today Kinsey's 'junk science' is the unquestioned foundation for all the legal, legislative and media debate on marriage and civil unions," the report said.

"Another entire paragraph was missing on the effect of Kinsey's fraud on the debate about homosexuality in legislatures nationwide - and the statement that these bogus data were cited by the U.S. Supreme Court to normalize sodomy in the Lawrence decision in 2003," the report said.

"The ALI Model Penal Code Reporters cite Kinsey's junk science claiming that in 1955, 72 percent of males experiment with mouth-genital contact, 40 to 50 percent of farm boys have animal contact, and 37 percent of the total male population has at least some overt homosexual experience to the point of orgasm between adolescence and old age,'" Haynes' actual introduction said.

Haynes went on to challenge the Kinsey findings.

"This accounts for nearly 2 males out of every 5 that one may meet. In spite of its reliance on junk science, this section of the Model Penal Code was cited favorably by the Supreme Court to normalize sodomy on June 26, 2003," Haynes' introduction also said.

The Arena, February 13, 2012

Sun News Networks' Michael Coren interviews Judith Reisman on The Arena.

By Bradlee Dean
WorldNetDaily, February 16, 2012

Last week in Los Angeles, a twisted teacher accused of sexually abusing elementary school students was stuck in jail, where he'll be for the foreseeable future. A Los Angeles County judge jacked his bail to $23 million from the initial $2.3 million at the request of prosecutors. Apparently, this judge understands that justice is the guardian of liberty.

But on the other hand, soft judges produce hardened criminals. How many pederasts (those who engage in homosexual child molestation) with 52 counts of child sex abuse are released on a minuscule bail?

For example, Jerry Sandusky, former Penn State football coach and head of the prominent children's charity The Second Mile, is accused on 52 criminal counts (with eyewitnesses testifying) stemming from accusations he molested 10 boys between 1994 and 2008, using his position to seduce vulnerable boys into forced sexual acts with him. Allegations range from forced oral sex on an 11-year-old boy to an eyewitness account by graduate assistant Mike McQuery of anal sex on a boy about 10 years of age in the Penn State showers. One boy said he traveled with Sandusky to multiple bowl games where the coach forced oral sex in his hotel room. Sandusky once threatened to send the boy home early if he kept resisting, the victim testified.

Judge Leslie Dutchot was the first judge to preside over the case. She had to be replaced because she had been a volunteer at Sandusky's charity, and she raised many eyebrows by giving Sandusky a $100,000 unsecured bail, meaning he did not have to pay it unless he missed his next court date. Prosecutors had requested bail of $500,000 and an ankle monitor for Sandusky. They got neither.

This week Sandusky appeared in court laughing several times while trying to answer questions from the judge when he took the stand during a hearing to hash out pretrial issues between his attorney and prosecutors. And why wouldn't he be laughing due to the fact that the judge concedes to every one of his requests? He can see his grandkids, drive to his attorney's office, shovel snow on his driveway, and sit on his back porch watching elementary children play during recess, as his yard borders a school's. The judge put a deaf ear no only to the 52 charges against him, but also to complaints of neighbors and school officials who saw him outside. Maybe Jerry should look at Scripture before he chuckles next time (Matthew 18:6).

When this case first broke, I said on my radio program, "The Sons of Liberty," the Sandusky scandal is just the tip of the iceberg of major pedophile rings in the United States.

Just when you didn't think it could get any worse, former FBI director Louis Freeh has been hired to investigate the case. If you recall, Freeh was the FBI director during the Alfred P. Murrah building bombing. He was also involved in Waco and Ruby Ridge in the 1990s. Is he the fox in the chicken coop, or is he there to bring forth justice? You decide.

This sure sounds familiar. Does Boys Town ring a bell?

Destroying biblically based sex laws with the Kinseyan fraudulent "sex science" post 1955 has spawned massive child sexual abuse and its necessary criminal cover-ups at the highest levels of law, government, justice, education and religion. (Editor drjudithreisman.com)

See the entire 10-hour documentary "My War" that chronicles my team's hard-hitting assemblies in public schools, exposing the lies of the culture that are so destructive to our youth.

Watch the trailer for "My War":

By Drew Zahn
WorldNetDaily, February 19, 2012

The American Life League, or ALL, has seen enough of Planned Parenthood's materials for children to conclude the nation's leading abortion provider is deliberately pushing kids toward sexual activity in order to drive up its business.

ALL, which calls itself the largest grassroots Catholic pro-life education organization in the United States, has produced a video report that contends Planned Parenthood has gone well beyond teaching kids about healthy human sexuality to purposefully exposing them to pornography in order to get impressionable young minds "hooked" on sex.

"The report drives home the fact that the abortion giant is given millions of dollars of taxpayer money annually and unfettered access to our children to provide smut that it terms 'age appropriate' so it can turn them into sex addicts," the organization claims.

"'Age appropriate' is a standard concocted by Planned Parenthood itself so that it can sell pornography to kids as science," says Michael Hichborn, producer of the ALL report. "If a dirty old man in a park showed 10-year-old children the graphic images Planned Parenthood pedals as education, he would be arrested."

The video report makes its case with dozens of clips and photos reportedly excerpted from Planned Parenthood materials and practices, including the following:

• Photos from Planned Parenthood community events that included penis-shaped lollipops and cupcakes, cakes decorated with frosting vaginas, vagina costumes and more.
• An educational children's book on the "benefits" of masturbation that includes graphic drawings not only of people masturbating, but of couples engaged in sexual intercourse.
• A site for teens that encourages masturbation and insists of homosexual and bisexual practices, "All these sexual orientations are perfectly normal."
• Videos joking about sex with sexual organ-shaped costumes and cartoon characters.
• A high school "Seriously Talking About Responsible Sex," or "STARS," program in New York that requires participating students to attend a live "gay pride" parade, which included public displays of nudity and sexual activity.
• Planned Parenthood college activities, including nude posters, a "no pants" party and free sex toys.

The video contends, "This is what Planned Parenthood is all about: Get the kids addicted to sex so it can sell them birth control; when teens catch a sexually transmitted disease, it sells them testing services; and when a young girl gets pregnant, it sells her an abortion.

"This isn't education," the video concludes. "It's indoctrination intended to drum up Planned Parenthood's abortion business."

The video itself can be seen below.

WARNING! CAUTION! This video contains explicit cartooned sex images of children and adults that have been and are being shown to primary age school children nationwide. Such images were once illegal, criminal to produce and distribute. Until our Kinseyfied laws are reversed by the US Supreme Court we are forced to reveal the child pornography being purchased by our school systems and sold as "sex education" to vulnerable children and adults. (Editor drjudithreisman.com)

ALL has established a website called StopPlannedParenthood.com to encourage the video's viewers to take action toward defunding Planned Parenthood.

"Planned Parenthood shows this smut to children and is awarded with more taxpayer money and the ability to determine the efficacy of its sex indoctrination, so it can get even more taxpayer money," Hichborn argues. "It is time to stop this madness!"

The concept of comprehensive sex education, which has been carried out in many Western countries and is being proposed as part of the  reproductive health (RH) bill -- is based on the fraudulent claims of a psychopath scientist who, in turn, based his data on pedophiles and sex offenders in jail, divulged media forensics expert Judith Reisman, Ph.D.

Speaking to a crowd of hundreds at the Philippine International Convention Center (PICC) Forum Tent in Pasay City Saturday, the Jewish American researcher, 76, held the audience's attention with slide upon slide of an entire timeline detailing the profound changes in society after the so-called "father of sexology," American entomologist and zoologist Dr. Alfred Kinsey, released in 1948 and 1953 bogus scientific research studies on human sexuality.

That a pseudoscientific "psychopath" manipulated his findings by basing his data on pedophiles and sex offenders in jail is no longer news, Kinsey's research having long been discredited. But the repercussions of this are hardly being talked about, particularly how governments and the media, scientific, and academic establishments have actually swallowed Kinsey's ideas and continue to use them in public policy formulation. It is thus headline material when someone like Reisman would travel all the way to the Philippines to deliver a talk entitled "A History of How Judeo-Christian Nations Now Face Pandemic Sex Disease/Crime."

Reisman's talk was essentially about the destruction of lives, of souls, on a massive scale, no thanks to the "unleashing of toxic sexual promiscuity worldwide" via sex education, the mainstreaming of pornography and the relaxing of sexual mores, among other after-effects, the media expert said.

A visiting professor of law at Liberty University School of Law (Virginia, USA) and a Vatican consultant on legal matters, Reisman used her knowledge of law, scientific research, and Catholic Church declarations to trace "how we got to where we are" since Kinsey. There is a war we are hardly aware of, even as it infiltrates our personal lives, from our media consumption, to fashion, sexual norms, and trendy ideas through a rampant but subtle conditioning of the mind. It is a battle between life and death, good and evil, perdition and salvation, an inescapable battle with long tentacles drawing us all in, whether we like it or not, extending to how we craft our laws via proposed legislations inimical to the values that our modern civilization is founded on.

But anti-life legislation such as the 'Reproductive Health' bills and the Anti-Discrimination bills are merely an offshoot of the war that has long begun in the classroom, she said, via the kind of 'sex education' inspired by Kinsey that schoolchildren receive, specifically the pleasure principle, the belief that being human is all about the pursuit of pleasure, particularly sexual pleasure.

Kinsey's belief that "children are sexual from birth," Reisman pointed out, is behind the teaching of sex to children at inappropriate ages, but this is just the tip of the iceberg, just the beginning of a long complex chain of consequences, including pornography through constant media exposure, sexual promiscuity, the rise in sex crimes (rape, child abuse, child prostitution), sexually transmitted diseases, abortion, homosexuality, pedophilia, depopulation campaigns cloaked in 'reproductive health,' etc.

She rounded up the usual suspects in the espousal of the Kinsey-inspired lifestyle and outlook, naming the International Planned Parenthood (IPPF), academics with Ph.D's., certain famous corporate funders, and even the United Nations.

"Baal worship has returned after 1948 in sex science robes," she described. Understandably, she was aghast the most at the way pedophiles now want to be called "minor-attracted persons," an otherwise minor note that left many in the audience gasping at the thought.

She called on all men to stand up in the fight against sexual maleducation and rally behind upholding life at all stages.

"It is a man's office to defend and protect women and children!" she declared.

She especially did not hide her displeasure over the current proposals for the RH bill and the so-called Anti-Discrimination bill in the Philippine legislature. She called on the rest of society to rail against these bills and join the fight in seeking solutions to the problem of the "sexual and cultural contagion" by upholding fidelity and chastity and other traditional values that engender -instead of cheapen -- sex and its sacred nature and purpose.
As a way of encouragement after the barrage of throught-provoking data, Reisman happily reported a past achievement in her long career of debunking fraudulent scientific claims: In 1994 she won a libel suit lodged by Playboy magazine against her in Holland, "the word's (epi)center of pedophilia."

With solid evidence, she accused the smut publication by saying their pornographic work abused children and had been abusing children since the 1950s.

"If we can win in Holland," she said, "we can win anywhere."

The former singer and songwriter has come a long way with this victory and with an advocacy she did not originally set out to pursue. Employed by the US Department of Justice, she only wanted to have an objective look at the Kinsey studies, until she wound up being among the top whistleblowers of our time against truth-benders and the conspiratorial politicking of truth.

At the end of the talk, Reisman roused the audience with exhortations delivered with apostolic zeal.

"Redeem the culture by following God's commands," she said. "Lobby against Kinsey's Sexology field because it is the weakest link" (in our adversary's counter-arguments)!

The talk was sponsored by the Alliance of Holy Family International. Spiritual director Fr. Edgardo 'Bing' Arellano gave some inspirational remarks that called the audience into action, after hearing what they heard. He underscored that "healing is possible" for the sexually addicted by devoting one's life to God and seeking Christian -- and not purely psychological -- professionals for help, if needed.

Reisman will be speaking at St. Theresa's College in Cebu on February 4.

[Slightly different text, without images]
CBCP News, Manila, January 31, 2012

We digress again from the ongoing impeachment tele-novela aired live from the Senate. The "show" has somehow lost its excitement and educational value as the outcome is becoming more and more predictable and the unpreparedness of the prosecution is getting more evident. Even some senator-judges are already impatient and bored. So let us turn our attention to the other function of Congress concerning enactment of laws which is its main task anyway. And this has something to do again with some harmful and dangerous provisions of the RH bill now being considered in both houses.

These provisions specifically refer to the proposed mandatory classroom based sex education in private and public schools where classroom teachers who may not be competent at all are tasked to teach their pupils as young as ten years old, lessons in sexuality, sexual rights, and reproductive health. While the bill also mentions lessons in values, more emphasis is given to contraceptive methods and services thus giving a clear impression that sexual behavior or activity even among minors is acceptable for as long as the risk of teenage pregnancy or early marriage are addressed.

The mandatory classroom based sex education provisions in the bill comes to mind once more because last Tuesday, I was privileged to listen to the lecture of Dr. Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., one of the most sought after speakers and consultants of parliaments, legislatures and courts worldwide regarding a) fraudulent sex science, sex education and b) the power and effect of images and media monopoly to alter human brain, mind, memory and conduct.

Apparently, and as usual we have again copied and patterned the proposed sex education program in classrooms after the sex education programs for young Americans which Dr. Reisman was discussing. Dr. Reisman clearly and convincingly traced the origin of this human sexuality education to Alfred Kinsey, the man who instigated the sexual revolution in the US way back in 1948 with his dubious scientific research on human sexual behavior that has since been referred to as the "Kinsey Reports".

These reports had such a tremendous impact on the morals of American society such that the era before 1948 has been known as the "pre-Kinsey Reports" while the era thereafter and up to now, is called the "post Kinsey Reports". As Dr. Reisman explained, after these reports came out, the field of American education had acquired a new dimension in the form of sexual education based on the sexual research of Alfred Kinsey who claimed that sexual activity began much earlier in life (from birth), so there is nothing wrong in teaching young people that sex can be fun.

In her book, "Sexual Sabotage", Dr. Reisman demolished the foundations of these two reports by showing that in his sexual research Kinsey merely "questioned an unrepresentative proportion of prison inmates and sexual offenders in a survey of 'normal' sexual behavior". She also pointed out that at least some of these offenders who are "the sources of information on stimulation to orgasm in young children" are pedophiles. "Sexual Sabotage" also tells the story of how Kinsey and his cohorts in Indiana University "sabotage our nation during World War II and the decades that followed by entering our libraries and schools as sex educators -- ridiculing marriage, fidelity and chastity. They preached widespread sexual experimentation, succeeded in nationwide fraud campaigns, and gutted the tough laws that kept pornography and predators at bay."

Dr. Reisman likewise relates in her book "how and why the children of the Greatest Generation traded their parents' traditional morality for Kinsey's sexual immorality believing that sexual freedom was their own idea" and "how billions made by the "Sex Industrial Complex' propelled pornography and the spread of Sexually Transmissible Diseases (STDs). And she backed this up with shocking statistics on the substantial increase in the number of teenage pregnancies, child sexual abuse, abortion and STDs in the United States. Then she mentioned that these "deviant fraud campaigns are vetted by the Rockefeller Foundation, the International Planned Parenthood Foundation (IPPF) which is the foremost advocate of abortion and later the Playboy Magazine.

Our legislators should therefore consider all these findings that have devastating effects on the social and moral fabric of a nation like the US which has sex education programs for young Americans that we are now substantially adopting in the proposed in the RH bill. And if only for this reason, they should scrap the bill right away. Instead they should think of how we can return to and restore the traditional sexual morality of Filipinos in the '50s and earlier which have somehow been also eroded by this fraudulent Kinsey Reports.

* * *

And speaking of the '50s, those years were indeed the golden era worth recalling and reminiscing. During those times, teenagers had not yet been affected by the modern concepts about human sexuality that was introduced by Kinsey in America. They look up to sex as something sacred and had high moral values inculcated by their parents. Of course there were also campus romances but they still observe and generally follow the Filipino custom of "no touch". It is thus timely to go back and try to remember those golden years.

And one of the ways of doing so is of course by attending school homecomings usually held annually. The UST High School is precisely holding such grand alumni homecoming tomorrow, Feb. 4, 2012 starting at 5 p.m. at the UST Plaza Mayor and Benavidez Garden coming just one week after the close of the University's 400th anniversary celebration. The grand alumni homecoming promises to be a colorful night of nostalgia, camaraderie, networking reminiscing and all around fun among alumni from 1940s all the way to 2011.

Also check out the information & resource pack (PDF) by the Women's Support Project, written for both parents and professionals, a 68-page document full of information and links.

By Judith A. Reisman, PhD
Institute of Education, London, December 1-2, 2011
View PDF version
View on Scribd