JAR-video-banner-small JAR-5-book-banner-small Stop-Kinsey-banner-small

White Papers | Posted: July 8, 2006

Utah Prosecutors Sex Crimes Investigators Speech

Where Have We Been? Where Are We Going?

The Kinsey Reports, Sex Experts, Pornography & Law

Speech Presented by

Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D.,

to

Utah Council for Crime Prevention

Prosecutors Sex Crimes Investigators & Detectives

November 2, 2005

It is always an honor to address those in law enforcement, on the front lines of public defense. In the next 45 minutes I will give you a crash course on the major causes for changes in America's criminal and social sexual life. You just saw a few minutes of a documentary broadcast on Fox that included some of the 45 minute Yorkshire Television's 1998 British documentary, "Kinsey's Pedophiles" based on my last book, Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences.

This documentary, made by England's Amnesty International award winning producer Tim Tate has never been shown in the USA. And yes, sex was still a somewhat serious event pre Kinsey.

I assume this short film introduction suggests why law enforcement would concern itself with Kinsey, who, like Darwin, is long dead. If the Radiation and the Tuskegee experiments were finally exposed, receiving a public apology from the President of the USA, so too do the victims of Kinsey's experiments deserve such recognition.

But beyond this, beyond the fact that the Kinsey Institute is still funded by state and federal taxes, law journals and statutes in over thirty states and still counting, provide compelling evidence that Kinsey's sex lies are everywhere used to subvert American sex laws and to cause grave, quite serious, hurt to men, women, children and society.

Even a perfunctory search of Kinsey's impact on Utah law yields this quote from a Gay Rights website:

In 1949 - The Utah Supreme Court upholds a sodomy conviction, but three justices argue against criminal penalties for sodomy, urging "treatment" instead. This is the first sodomy opinion in the United States to refer to the Kinsey studies. [1]

The Utah judicial call for treatment as a sex crime punishment follows one year after Kinsey's first book is released. In 2005 a major Fox film, two PBS specials and a Broadway musical all portray Alfred Kinsey as a brilliant, tragi-hero. On the other hand, in 2005, nineteen conservative scholars vote Sexual Behavior in the Human Male the most harmful American book in 200 years. Both sides agree his sex data largely shaped western sexuality and direct today's sex laws, treatment and public policies. Kinsey is important for your work.

In fact, my study of pornography and child sexual abuse led me to Kinsey. During the Reagan years, as Principal Investigator for the largest US Department of Justice study on "soft" pornography ever conducted, I used the military intelligence method of Content Analysis to document the quantity and quality of "Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler." [2]

My findings were used in a major U.S. Supreme Court child pornography case, were cited by Southland's 7-11 director when his stores divested from Playboy and Penthouse; helped the Simi Valley District Attorney convict a Hustler cartoonist of incestuous abuse of his daughter; "insured a favorable ruling for the state" in the Mapplethorpe trial on what constitutes "the whole"; and were victorious in a lawsuit brought in the Netherlands when Playboy sued a Dutch television station for my charge that Playboy promoted incest and systemically displayed child pornography in cartoons and photographs. [3]

Although Kinsey is credited with dramatically effecting the US Supreme Court's decisions on pornography, the new, verifiable data from brain sciences may be used to reverse much of the leniency provided to pornography.

We are dealing here with the addictive properties of sexually explicit images, commonly called pornography.2

My working, scientific definition of pornography is measurable: "intimate private-space behavior in public space forums, provoking psychopharmacological responses in viewers that put the model and those s/he represents, at risk."

Thanks to the latest advances in neuroscience, we now know that emotionally arousing images imprint and alter the brain, triggering an instant, involuntary, but lasting, biochemical memory trail.

This applies to so-called "soft-core" and "hard-core" pornography, which may, arguably, subvert the First Amendment by overriding the cognitive speech process.

Once our neurochemical pathways are established they are difficult or impossible to delete. Erotic images commonly trigger the viewer's "fight or flight" sex hormones producing intense arousal states that appear to fuse the conscious state of libidinous arousal with unconscious emotions of fear, shame, anger and hostility.3

These media erotic fantasies become deeply imbedded, commonly coarsening, confusing, motivating and addicting many of those exposed. (See "the Violence Pyramid" at http://www.vbii.org/violence.html).

Pornography triggers a myriad of endogenous, internal, natural drugs that mimic the "high" from a street drug. Addiction to pornography is addiction to what I dub erototoxins - mind ≠altering drugs produced by the viewer's own brain.

How does this 'brain sabotage' occur? Brain scientists tell us that "in 3/10 of a second a visual image passes from the eye through the brain, and whether or not one wants to, the brain is structurally changed and memories are created - we literally 'grow new brain' with each visual experience."4

It is now confirmed that the human brain is not fully matured, developed in logic and foresight until about age 25. Still, children and others who cannot read, can instantly decode and experience images, hence images are not speech.5 In fact, erotic (any highly arousing) images commonly subvert left hemisphere cognition.6

Since the 50s, as pornography became mainstreamed and pushed the envelope of normal sexual conduct, law enforcement reported that sex crimes mimicking comparable acts were being inflicted on women and children. (See OJJDP study)

I have spent decades addressing the effects of pornographic "humor" and photos on children, fathers, husbands and wives and communities, much of which is found in my book, ''Soft" Porn Plays Hardball, 1990,8 my OJJDP report, Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler,9 and my white paper on "The Psychopharmacology of Pictorial Pornography: Restructuring Brain, Mind & Memory & Subverting Freedom of Speech" (http://www.dJjudithreisman.com/brain.pdf).

Testimony from victims and police commonly find pornography to be an on-site-sex-abuse manual. 10

As was the original design of our research project in 1981, an offensive strategy should be planned mandating law enforcement collection of all pornography data, as with guns, drugs, etc, at crime sites.

Judges, police, legislators and lawyers should be trained in the hard data of sexology fraud, the effect of sexology forensic experts and erototoxins as changing laws and the human brain, mind, memory, and body, at unconscious levels and therefore absent informed consent.

The current pattern of funding educational institutions that train their students via the flawed methodology of Kinseyan "academic" pornography11 compromises law enforcement efforts to educate those in their field as well as judges and juries regarding a myriad of cases, from child custody to gender confusion to sex education, to rape and statutory rape, etc. As with phrenology at the turn of the century, all expert witnesses coming out of Kinsey based sexology training should have their credentials rescinded.

I also used Content Analysis to measure the influence of Kinsey's junk science on American penal law, finding Kinsey the most oft cited sex expert in all social science, science indices and Westlaw. [4]

It is argued here that, on the evidence, Indiana University's fraudulent Kinsey Reports, implemented via the American Law Institute (ALI), Model Penal Code (MPC), [5] are causally implicated in the assault on American sexuality, safety, health and welfare.

LAW PROTECTS, TEACHES AND POINTS THE WAY

Justice Louis Brandeis said "the conditions" under which we live largely turn on what is lawful. [6] In 1998 Justice Stephen Breyer said what is lawful now turns "almost entirely" on what science says. [7] So, if sex science turns law and law turns sexual conduct, than bad sex science creates bad sex law which creates bad (injurious) sexual conduct.

You be the judge. Stepping back in time, it is late 1930s. Following public outrage following the rape and murder of two little girls, J. Edgar Hoover declares a "war on the sex criminal...a sinister threat to American childhood and womanhood." [8]

Sexual Psychopath laws are passed nationwide, allowing lifetime incarceration for sex offenders. No registration. No Megen's law. No Three Strikes. Prison, even execution is commonly permitted for rape and statutory rape. [9] Tom Brokaw describes the Greatest Generation:

Faith in God was...part of the lives of the WW II generation...They stayed true to their values of personal responsibility, duty, honor, and faith... [Those] outside their families reminded them of the ethos of their family and community. [10]

       	The Greatest Generation is a society in which contraception is restricted to the 
married and seduction, alienation of affection, breach of promise, adultery,
fornication and abortion are considered immoral and actually criminal. In that
environment "illegitimacy," rape, venereal disease, divorce or homicide (common
results from adultery) are minimal.

By late 1945 our soldiers are returning home, rebuilding their lives and the nation. Streets are crowded with people in the day; parks fill with strolling couples at dusk.

Construction booms; homes, streets, highways, stores, farms are going up everywhere. Schools are crowded with children. The pledge of Allegiance starts the day, religion is commonly taught and students disciplined for running in the halls or chewing gum. High school children may learn about sex in hygiene

They are told sex belongs only in marriage so children are welcome and loved. Couples take VD tests for syphilis and gonorrhea before they can marry. Typical film entertainment is; The Road to Rio, Hamlet, Red Shoes. Typical television includes Our Miss Brooks, The Ed Sullivan Show, The CBS News. No tongue kissing, no rape scenes, no open cadavers being carved, no teachers seducing high school boys on teenage programs; it is, generally "wholesome."

Since most men in 1948 view women as the "weaker sex," men are generally expected to bear the responsibility for their own sexual conduct and even to take responsibility for that of any woman with whom they are close. [11] In 1948, as virginity is seriously valued and guarded, women who charge rape are largely believed by the court so that seduction and breach of promise are still criminalized in most states. [12] Most pornography is illegal, rape and statutory rape can be punished by death in half our states and life in almost all the rest.

Our 1948 sex laws reflect national attitudes that had increased Age of Consent to 18 in most states and 16 years old in most others.

In 1948 adultery, being immoral is illegal and grounds for "fault" divorce; the deceived party-husband or wife--gets child custody, house, car and most shared goods. Women will also get alimony and child support.

The Kinsey lobby will change all that. James Jones, a Kinsey biographer, says the Kinsey lobby will end the sexual repression [13] of "English-American common law traditions." [14] Done.

What was obscenity in 1948 is, in 2005 commonly seen as pornography or even erotica. Now, rape may get 0 to 10 years or a fine; statutory rape may or may not be a crime as age of consent--12 to 18-- depends on the offender's age. Seduction, breach of promise, fornication, even partial birth abortion are legal and adultery is now "no-fault divorce" placing millions of dumped moms and their children in dire poverty and on the slippery slope to abuse and crime.

How did it happen? The unprecedented Rockefeller funded mass media blitz, [15] heralds Kinsey's Male report as "The K-Bomb." More than 70% of press headlines and feature articles hype Kinsey's Male and Female. [16]

Immediately following the Male report, ACLU co-founder Morris Ernst [17] and other Kinsey lobbyists--radical academics, jurists, eugenicists, psychiatrists--publish four books. Each demands sex crimes be reduced or purged and that sexual predators get therapy not penalty, like Utah. [18]

What did Kinsey lobbyists claim that changed our lives?

Well, that 10-37% of American men are sometime homosexual so legalize sodomy; 50% of men and 26% of women are adulterous and all women want to be so legalize adultery and no fault divorce; 85% of men and half of women fornicate so legalize all sex outside of marriage, opening the floodgates to explicit school sex education; 69% of men use prostitutes so trivialize sex for pay; 87% of single women and 25% of wives abort so legalize abortion; 100% of infants and children are orgasmic if helped by adults so trivialize child sexual abuse. Also, smart people use pornography so legalize it--and they masturbate so destigmitize it.

Kinsey admits this sexual promiscuity has no consequence in rape, VD, abortion, child sexual abuse or divorce. So, its all harmless and professors in college

rooms explain that the Greatest Generation has therefore lied by saying sexual promiscuity leads to trouble. The GG are liars and hypocrites. They fornicate in the hay on Saturday and pray in the pews on Sunday but they "keep it from the kids" as Simon and Garfinkle sing in Mrs. Robinson. The floodgates open to the sexual revolution, angry, deceived Baby Boomers turn off the Greatest Generation and turn on to sex, drugs & rock ën roll.

Now, our World War II soldiers didn't lie, the Kinsey lobby lied. First, the Kinsey Institute propaganda machine pictures him as a conservative, bow tied husband, father, scholar. Most of you now know that Kinsey is actually a sadomasochistic, pornographically and autoerotically obsessed bihomosexual,

Kinsey circumcises himself in the bathtub without benefit of anesthesia, hangs himself from a pole by his sexual organs until losing consciousness; and dies of complications stemming from "orchitis" a sexually transmitted disease associated with the self inflicted attacks on his genitalia.

Kinsey, the father of the sexual revolution, the new field of human sexuality, of the current sex education curricula for K through doctorate and continuing education credits for doctors, lawyers, prosecutors, priests, teachers, mental health and social worker professionals, etc, is, clinically speaking, a bone fide sexual psychopath. As a sex cult leader, his followers, with doctorate degrees, are as well.

Pornography is the fuel that acts as a
catalyst for fantasy-driven behavior." [19]

--- Vernon J. Geberth, retired Lt. Commander of the NYPD

Kinsey's lies about American women mimic the WWII "Black Propaganda" designed to depress and weaken men at the front. Enemy leaflets claim sweethearts and wives fornicate and abort babies. It worked in the war and at home. Kinsey's called wives anyone who lived "one year" with a man-his large prostitute population. Sexual deviants become the model for normal sex laws and conduct. [20]

Kinsey's "data" -- that fornication and adultery are common and harmless will enfeeble dad as a moral authority. [21] Kinsey proves The Greatest Generation dad, our World War II hero, is a playboy. [22]

Really?

The manly duty to protect women and children is foolish if statistics prove fornication, adultery, seduction, etc are harmless. Kinsey's phony statistics undermine trust in dad, dad's trust in himself and the family trust in one another.

In 1948 ACLU lawyer Morris Ernst says, "every page of the Kinsey Report touches on...the legal code." Ernst tells the legal profession:

[N]o bar association, law school journal, or lawyers' committee can consider [sex] laws...without the Kinsey study. Kinsey's first volume ended an era. [23]

Kinsey and his lobbyists methodically create and advise state "Sex Offense Commissions:" New Jersey (1949), California (1949), Illinois (1953) and others. The commission findings become part of the American Law Institute Model Penal Code of 1955.

Knowing full well the data are bogus, the Rockefeller Foundation, funding Kinsey since 1941, shifts its money early 1950 to the American Law Institute.

They support a Model Penal Code that uses Kinsey's bad sex data to reduce sex law penalties.

The ALI Model Penal Code schematic (left) that you have, [24] illustrates how Kinsey's pansexuality percolates down into all legislatures to abolish common law supports for marital stability and societal peace and safety. [25] [26]

In 1949 Kinsey tells California's "Subcommittee on Sex Crimes" that 95% of American men are sex offenders; that paroling all predators will lower sex crime and, that children are unharmed by rape unless police and parents get "hysterical." His perjury leads California and all other states to reduce rather than strengthen sex crime penalties. [27]

By 1952 professor Herbert Wechsler in The Harvard Law Review, calls for "science-based" legal reform, via a Model Penal Code. [28] In 1953 the "Illinois Commission on Sex Offenders" says a "cultural tendency to overprotect women and children" is more "detrimental" to victims than sex crimes.

The commission brags, "The Kinsey findings... permeate all present thinking on this subject." [29]

December 1953, believing Kinsey that mom and "the girl next door" are sexual adventurers and adulteresses, college men, feeling double-crossed and deceived, are open to Playboy.

A few years later 1957-8 the FBI purges all statutory rape data with or without consent from their Uniform Crime Report. Not until the year 2000 will any U.S. Department of Justice database publish data on sex crimes against children under age twelve. The FBI UCR and most DOJ data still exclude rape of children under twelve.

In 1965, with no record of school sex crimes in Illinois, the Commission implements "sex education" in all schools as the best "step in [sex] crime prevention which Illinois can make." [30] School districts nationwide follow suit-for the purpose of sex crime prevention. You do the math.

In 1950 MPC author Paul Tappan writes the "New Jersey Commission Habitual Sex Offender" report, consulting with Kinsey and Kinsey clone Judge Morris Ploscowe. Tappan says Kinsey proved "legal and moral" sex laws [31] don't work.

Wechsler, Ploscowe [32] , Tappan and attorney Louis Schwartz are ALI-MPC "Sex Offenses" authors. Ploscowe's cite to Kinsey that "a total clean-up of sex offenders" would "put 95% of the male population in jail," [33] is quoted everywhere. If all men are sex offenders, sex crime penalties are useless. Like Kinsey's false 10% to 37% homosexuality statistic that launched the "gay rights" movement, [34] this too will change our culture.

Law professor Schwartz says its OK to lie to cripple sex laws; just say we are making technical improvements. [35] Schwartz brags:

[People resist when] smaller numbers of articulate opinion-makers launch an open attack on the old...traditional faith...If I must make a moral judgment, it is in favor of the individual visionaries who are willing to pay the personal cost to challenge the old moral order. [36]

In 1955, one hundred percent of the ALI-MPC "Sex Offenses" footnotes on sexual normality cite to Kinsey. The ALI-MPC is sent to state legislatures, all of whom, believing the Code to be scientifically factual, adopt it all or in part from 1955 to 1980, ending the common law era.

Dr. Manfred Guttmacher, head of the Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry-GAP--an ALI-MPC advisor, convinces ALI chief author, Professor Wechsler, that therapy should replace punishment in the law. [37] It largely has. The GAP folks who will determine normality wants "full responsibility for sexual behavior" to be at the "age of 7," [38] adding:

Kinsey's findings were the points by which we steered. The debt that society will owe to Kinsey and his co-workers for their research on sexual behavior will be immeasurable. [39]

SEXUAL BEINGS FROM BIRTH

THE "FOUR OR FIVE" YEAR OLD SEDUCTRESSES

Indeed. The Kinsey Institute team claims sex offenders seldom re-offend and sexual promiscuity does not cause sex crime, disease or divorce.

For the first time in American history [40] immoral behavior is re

ified as having no public health consequences, it is suddenly "private." [41] This will have disastrous public health consequence. In 1948 Ploscowe explains [42]

[E]nforcement of the prohibitions of sex legislation [are a] failure ... out of touch with the realities of [life], and... inherently unenforceable ...the law attempts to forbid an activity which responds to a wide human need. [43]

A sample of Law Review statements follow-leading up to the current sex crime pandemic. In 1962 law and psychiatry author Ralph Slovenko takes Ploscowe's "wide human need" further:

Even at the age of four or five, this [female] seductiveness may be so powerful as to overwhelm the adult into committing the offense. The affair is therefore not always the result of the adult's aggression; often the young female is the initiator and seducer. [44]

In the 1966 Brooklyn Law Review Ploscowe says eliminate statutory rape laws:

[A] girl at puberty fully understands...sexual intercourse and the fiction of non-consent, which the law sets up, does not correspond to the facts. [45]

Ploscowe, doubtless like Kinsey, battling his own private demons, [46] says Kinsey's "scientific data" should reduce "sex offender" penalties." [47]

Dr. Linda Jeffrey's research into early law review articles and state statutes confirms these reductions based on Kinsey and the ALI-MPC.

      Where marital coitus was earlier the only lawful sexual congress, and rape could get 
death in 18 states and life in 22 others, now some states have purged the term "rape"
  entirely from their law. The Gay Rights website, that was pleased to report Kinsey's
role in swaying judicial softness on sodomy, identifies age 18 in Utah for consent,
adding, the "age of sexual consent may be lower at 16 as long as it does not involve
force?" To sense how the nation was shifted, listen, briefly:

1969 The Georgia Law Review: Child molestation is a "relatively minor crime...[The] absurdity of enforcing most of our sex laws...should be obvious, even to the most prudish Neo-Puritans." [48] "Pedophiles comprise the largest

of sex offenders," and advised by Kinsey, the author says molesters "should be released on probation" or after paying "a small fine" if they didn't use "physical force," [49] an oxymoron.

1973 The Missouri Revision Commission: Rape and child abuse "carry extremely severe punishment...Those few who are punished are dealt with cruelly, to the satisfaction of no one except a shrinking frenetic fringe of maniacal moralists." [50]

"[R]apist should not be used in the statutory non consent cases...The Code reserves that term for the most heinous sexual offender ...For, one may have sex with a "fully consenting...social companion...of 12 years of age." (The last Missouri review found consent at age 14). [51]

1976 Maine Law Review: "Only threats of serious bodily injury, kidnapping, or death will suffice to make out the crime of rape." [52]

1983 The New Jersey Law Journal: "[T]he older term "rape" was fraught with negative emotion and unrealistic for this era...There is no justification for the perception that the female is a unique creature, harmed in some unique way by untoward sexual behavior." [53]

Rape penalties have grown trivial. In complex, gradated laws on "age of consent" even little victims (age four in Georgia) are on trial. Often, to prove rape even a child must have proofs of "force."

The two Georgia elements to be proven are "against her will", which is proven if the victim is under 10; and "forcibly" required of all rape victims, regardless of age. Georgia annotations in the current law state:

The fact that a victim is under the age of consent may supply the "against her will" element in a forcible rape prosecution ... [but not] force as a matter of law. State v. Collins, 70 Ga. 42, 508 S.E.2d 390 (1998).

The practical results? In 1990, the American Bar Association reports that 80% of convicted child molesters plea-bargain and serve no prison time. [54] Felons often receive outpatient "treatment for his sexual orientation to children" at taxpayer expense. [55]

The Kinsey Reports are the only "scientific" research to "prove" children are erotic from birth and desirous of sexual acts. Until 2000, data on sexual abuse of children under age 12 are unavailable from the U.S. Department of Justice longitudinal studies. As noted, the FBI purged all post 1958 statutory rape data from its Uniform Crime Report of "rape." [56]

Clearly some in governmental agencies and aligned therapeutic fields agree that four-year-olds "may...be the seducers" of older men. [57]

In the 1952 Harvard Law Review Wechsler called for a MPC because, he said, the high crime rate proves common laws are ineffective and "unscientific." [58] But, from 1965 to 1975, after most state codes on violent crime had been relaxed, "the violent crime rate in the United States roughly tripled." [59]

And, according to the official FBI "Index of Crime," from 1970 to 1999 violent crime increased another 396%. [60] The ALI-MPC mission to reduce crime has failed. Children and women are ever more victimized by both criminals and the justice field. In 1981 President Ronald Reagan said a "tragic era" stained our justice system:

For the past thirty years justice has been unreasonably tilted in favor of criminals and against their innocent victims. This tragic era can fairly be described as a period when victims were forgotten and crimes were ignored. [61]

President Reagan's observation, that justice now favors the guilty, dates back to 1951, when laws, according to the National Research Council, began to "divide somewhat crudely into the pre-Kinsey and post-Kinsey eras." [62] This fanatical legal favoritism is unrelenting.

Nor does the 14% increase in the under 20 population (1960 to 2000) and the 52% increase in the general population do explain spiraling sex crimes, venereal diseases/AIDS, illegitimacy, divorce and abortions. Note below a few less well-known statistics from the post-Kinsey years, 1960 to 1999. [63]

1960 to 1999

70% Increase in murder reports

168% Increase in aggravated assault reports

418% Increase in "forcible rape" reports (excludes many child victims) [64]

1,300% to 5,166% Increase in child sex abuse reports 1982-1999 [65]

In 1999

67% reported sex abuse victims are children under 18

64% reported forced sodomy victims are boys under 12 [66]

4,200 (to 19,000) "in school" rapes and sexual assaults [67]

350,000 estimated children in prostitution/pornography, etc. [68]

58,200 non familial abductions of children.

CONCLUSION

Indiana Law School Dean, Frank Horack, Jr. forecast Kinsey's impact on the legal profession in a 1950 Illinois Law Review:

The principal impact of the Kinsey Report will be on...the law...[aiding] police officers, prosecutors, judges, probation officers and superintendents of penal institutions [in] judging individual cases. Officials will read it. Defense counsel will cite it...Even when not offered into evidence, it will condition official action. Psychiatrists, psychologists, penologists, juvenile and probation officers...will use the data and their professional advice will be heeded by the judge. Here the Report will control many decisions and dictate the disposition and treatment of many offenders. [69]

Was Horack's prediction accurate? Westlaw, America's prestigious law journal database begun in 1982, cites over 700 law journal articles touting Kinsey from 1982 to 2003, with runner-up Masters and Johnson under 200 times. [70] In academe, Kinsey is cited 1.5 x more than Masters & Johnson, 2 x more than Freud and 4 x more than Paiget. [71]

Reprising Justice Breyer, the higher authority of "science" has now fully displaced the authority of the common law based on the Old and New Testaments. So the truthfulness and accuracy of "scientists" now largely determines the nation's law and public policy.

I questioned two US Supreme Court Justices on what could be done about laws changed, or cases decided, based on fraudulent science. Each advised me that such laws could be challenged and could be recalled.

The Kinsey reports are toxic. Attorneys Generals, police, prosecutors, detectives, legislators and pro-family leaders must be educated as to the venues in which to use this powerful information on the subversion of our sex laws by bogus sex data. Now, the Kinsey Institute lobby, Big Sexology has combined with Big Pornography and Big Pharmacology to create the Sex Industrial Complex. Sexual arousal drugs and STD vaccines are the wave of the future for adults and youths.

Before the Kinsey Reports and the revolutionary changes wrought by the ALI MPC, legal history points to a time when women and children were largely safe in their streets and parks, even should they choose to take an evening stroll; when sexual violence, disease, and dysfunction were almost non existent compared to today. Attorneys Generals, prosecutors, state legislatures should review and rectify the criminal law reforms brought in during the sexual revolution. We have a right to civility, to a return to relative safety and security for law-abiding citizens. In his farewell address, George Washington warned

Resist with care the spirit of innovation...which will undermine what cannot be directly overthrown...remember that time and habit are at least as necessary to fix the true character of governments...[and that] changes [based on] mere hypothesis and opinion, exposes to perpetual change, from the endless variety of hypothesis and opinion. [72]

I thank you.

ENDNOTES & DISCUSSION

[2] Judith A, Reisman, Images of Children, Crime & Violence in Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler; "The Role of Pornography and Media Violence in Family Violence, Sexual Abuse and Exploitation, and Juvenile Delinquency, Grant No. 84-JN-AX-K007, The United States Department of Justice, Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, January 1989.

[3] My training in Content Analysis also yielded the proofs of child sexual abuse by active pedophiles as a scientific protocol for the Kinsey Reports, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953).

[4] See the details of Kinsey's citations in Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences (1998, 2000, 2003). Also, the most lucid discussion of the common law for "citizen lawyers" appears in the monumental work of Herbert W. Titus, God, Man, and Law: The Biblical Principles, Institute in Basic Life Principles, Oak Brook, Illinois, 1994.

[5] "Secret History: Kinsey's Pedophiles." BBC Yorkshire Television Documentary aired August 10, 1998. See also, Reisman, Kinsey, Crimes and Consequences. (2nd ed.). Crestwood, KY: Institute for Media Education, 2000, for citations and evidence. Kinsey is fully documented as directing the sexual torture of hundreds of children by hired and hidden pedophiles. There is additional circumstantial evidence of great weight that Kinsey himself was involved in at least some of the hands on sexual abuse of these children. In any case, his role in seeking out those who would commit incest and other forms of child sexual abuse, training these men and soliciting and receiving their films and "records" of abuse qualifies Kinsey as engaged in child sexual abuse.

[6] Leonard Baker, Brandeis and Frankfurter: A Dual Biography. Washington Square, NY: New York University Press, 1986, at 29. Brandies' opening remarks to his business law students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (Emphasis added)

[7] Stephen Breyer, Science and Society: "The Interdependence of Science and Law." Science Magazine, April 24, 1998.

[8] Peggy Sanday, A Woman Scorned: Acquaintance Rape on Trial, Doubleday, NY, NY, 1996, at 144-145.

[9] Supra, note 11.

[10] Tom Brokow, The Greatest Generation, Random House, 2001. Brokow writes, "A sense of personal responsibility and a commitment to honesty is a characteristic of this generation...It's how they were raised...Disciplined by their military training and sacrifices. They married in record numbers..." at 37, 55, xx.

[11] Judith Reisman, Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences, (2nd ed.) The Institute for Media Education, Crestwood, KY. 2000, pp. 88-103.

[12] Id., at 195 for the list of 52 laws targeted for elimination or lightening. See pages 187-268 for history of law changes.

[13] James Jones, Alfred C. Kinsey: A Public/Private Life. NY: W.W. Norton, 1997 at 619.

[14] Jones, Ibid.

[15] Geoffrey Gorer, "Justification By Numbers: A Commentary on the Kinsey Report" in, The American Scholar, Volume 17, United Chapters of Phi-Beta Kappa, New York, 1948, at 281. See also James Jones, "Dr. Kinsey's Secret Life," The New Yorker, September 1, 1997, at 109 and Reisman, supra..note 9, p. 37.

[16] Of interest, in the 1917 House Congressional Record, the then Congressman Callaway of Texas read into the record the following statement: "[In a] March 1915 meeting of the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel ship building, and power interests, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States." Callaway explained these men then selected "176 news papers," purchasing "control of 25 of the greatest papers...an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information...vital to the interests of the purchases." Congressional Record, Volume LIV, Debates of the 64th Congress, Government Printing Office, 1917; at 2947. Additional research confirms that this "philanthropic" mass media control continues to function unabated. See also, Reisman, supra, note 9 p. 37.

[17] Morris Ernst was also the ACLU obscenity advocate and lawyer for fashionable eugenicists and population controllers prominent in the first half of the 20th century.

[18] Supra, note 9.

[19] MORALITY IN MEDIA, INC, emal, November 2, 2005.

[20] Indiana University and mass media endorsements have been vital both to Kinsey's credibility and the mushrooming American field of human sexuality that Kinsey founded. But the truth is a stubborn thing. Indiana University continually and falsely marketed Kinsey as a conventional, mid-western academic family man. On October 13, 1997, the National Review reported that the "sexual revolution" would face a potentially serious setback were it known that the father of the American field of human sexuality is a pornography obsessed, impotent homosexual psychopath who died prematurely with complications from orchitis, a result of the barbaric abuses he routinely inflicted upon his reproductive organs. Kinsey's dreadful "rough sex" death is the sexual revolution, writ large.

No amount of polish can now obscure the fact that Kinsey is not the unbiased, detached and conventional sex researcher IU presented to America. In the August 25-September 1, 1997 New Yorker, James Jones, the Rockefeller fellow who wrote his thesis on the Kinsey Institute, reported that Kinsey, as a closeted homosexual, engaged in reckless sadistic and public sex acts with his male students, male research subjects and male co-workers. He put his wife, his colleagues and their wives in sex films made in the attic of his Bloomington family home and implicitly in his soundproofed offices on the IU campus. Kinsey's obsessive use of obscenity in association with his masochistic and sadistic self-abuse appears to have hastened his early demise.

Again, briefly, the sexual revolution stood on the Reports' revelations that our parents are hypocritical sexual adventurers, who lied to us about their chastity and thus their religious beliefs. But Kinsey's data met no scientific standard. It is now known that Kinsey directed at least nine pedophile "observers" in sexual atrocities on up to 2,035 infants and children. Beyond this, the Report data published in 1948 and 1953--and republished in 1998-were and are scientifically fraudulent. Covering up his use of 86% to 87% of aberrant and purged men, Kinsey claimed 95% of "normal" American husbands, fathers, uncles and brothers are sex offenders; 69% use prostitutes; 85% "fornicate"; 50% are adulterers; and 10-37% are part or full-time homosexuals, justifying Playboy's recreational sex and Harry Hay's homosexual movement.

[21] Ernst was the lawyer for both Kinsey and Margaret Sanger, the Planned Parenthood founder.

[22] Morris Ernst & David Loth, American Sexual Behavior and The Kinsey Report. New York: Greystone Press, 1948, at 81, 83.

[23] Morris Ernst, The Kinsey Report and the Law, in Sexual Behavior in American Society, Jerome Himelhoch and Sylvia Fava, (Eds.). W.W. Norton, New York, 1948, at 245.

[24] Copies of the full page schematic are available from rsvpamerica.org.

[25] W.R. LaFave, Modern Criminal Law, Cases, Comments and Questions, St. Paul: West Publishing Company, 1988. at 47. While Kinsey has been dead since 1956, Indiana University Press and the Kinsey Institute republished both Reports verbatim in 1998. Kinsey's reports, like Darwin's Origin of the Species, have shaped our political and national life.

[26] Carol Innone, "All in the Family," The National Review, October 15, 2001, at. 74, quoting Bill Bennett, writes that marital breakdown, begun in 1960, resulted in, "social pathologies...crime, welfare," drugs, STD's.

[27] Preliminary Report of the Subcommittee on Sex Crimes of the Assembly Interim Committee on Judicial System and Judicial Process, California Assembly, March 8, 1950.

[28] Herbert Wechsler, "Challenge of a Model Penal Code." Harvard Law Review, Vol. 65, 1952. Wechsler was also a former Assistant Attorney General. Later as chief of the eleven ALI-MPC "Sex Offenses" creators, he says his elite cadre saw themselves as a "legislative commission, charged with constructing an ideal penal code." See Wechsler, "A Thoughtful Code of Substantive Law," Journal of Criminal Law, Criminality, and Police Science, Vol. 45, 1955, at 524-525.

[29] Report of the Illinois Commission on Sex Offenders, March 15, 1953, at 9. The report identifies Alfred C. Kinsey and W. B. Pomeroy as members of the workgroup outlining a "Framework for Sex Offender Laws."

[30] The Illinois Commission on Sex Offenders, April 1965, at 2.

[31] "Report and Recommendations of the Commission on the Habitual Sex Offender as Formulated by Paul W. Tappan, Technical Consultant," February 1, 1950, at 18, emphasis added.

[32] Morris Ploscowe directed the work of the 1939 Mayors Commission For the Study of Sex Offenses. Tappan repeats Ploscowe's data in the New Jersey Report in 1950. Robert Dickinson, also a New York Commission sex crimes advisor, had trained Rex King, the psychopath whose sex assaults on over 800 infants and children became lionized as Kinsey's "child orgasm" data. Cited in Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences, p. 164. Ploscowe's cover-up of crime data is made visible by an analysis of Ludwig's "Control of the Sex Criminal," St. John's Law Review, Vol. 25, 1950, pp. 203-233.

[33] Morris Ploscowe, "Sexual Patterns and the Law" in Sex Habits of American Men, A Symposium on the Kinsey Report. (Albert Deutsch, Ed.). New York: Prentice Hall, 1948, at 121, Ploscowe is quoting Kinsey, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, 1948, at 392.

[34] Ronald Ray, Gays: In or Out? Military Necessity & Homosexuality, Brassey's Maxwell Macmillan Co., New York, 1992, 1993.

[35] Louis B. Schwartz, "Sexual Behavior in the Human Male" (book review), University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 96, 1947-48, p. 917. Schwartz continued, "...especially if it can be done in the course of a general revision of the penal code. This avoids the appearance of outright repudiation of conservative moral standards."

[36] Schwartz, "Morals Offenses and the Model Penal Code," Columbia Law Review, Vol. 63, 1963 at 672-673.

[37] Manfred is the twin of Planned Parenthood's Alan Guttmacher. "Criminals require treatment not punishment," says Manfred. Soon, state penal revisions identify sex criminals as "actors" and "patients," demean victims as "complainants," and privatize "Offenses against Morality" as "Sex Offenses."

[38] Psychiatrically Deviated Sex Offenders, Report No. 9, Committee on Forensic Psychiatry of the Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry, February 1950, p. 2.

[39] David Allyn. "Private Acts/Public Policy: Alfred Kinsey, the American Law Institute and the Privatization of American Sexual Morality." Journal of American Studies 30, 1996, at 3, 405-428.

[40] Allyn, Ibid.

[41] Sex Offender Treatment: Research Results Inconclusive About What Works to Reduce Recidivism. Government Accounting Office, GGD-96-137, June 21, 1996. Recent federal health institution studies covering the past half a century of treatment modalities for sex offenders conclude that no form of psychotherapy has arrested sexual predation. This can logically be viewed as a report identifying the failure of the treatment mode of penology.

[42] In New York, Ploscowe proposes that all sex offenses can be processed as "misdemeanor sexual misconduct." Kentucky law once held rape as a capital offense: The law today echoes the New York law: Comments to their sexual misconduct statute states, "KRS 510.140, represents the basic crimes of rape and sodomy and thus includes all of the higher degrees of each of these crimes. It provides a useful plea-bargaining tool for the prosecutor in certain cases even though some degree of forcible compulsion or incapacity to consent may be present." On December 30, 1979, the New York Times described New Jersey as "hung up lately on the subject of sex." During 1979, according to the NYT report, New Jersey:

Set the age at which teen-agers could legally consent to sex

Allowed municipalities to establish "zones" for live sex shows and pornography

Legalized incest over the age of 16

Legalized necrophilia and sodomy

Legalized adultery, fornication, promiscuity, and seduction resulting in pregnancy. Reduced penalties for the sale of commercial consumer sex (prostitution).

[43] Morris Ploscowe, Sexual Patterns and the Law, in Deutch, A. (Ed.). Sex Habits of American Men, New York: Prentice Hall, 1948, at 126.

[44] Ralph Slovenko, & C. Phillips, Psychosexuality and the Criminal Law. Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 15, 1962. at 809. (Emphasis added)

[45] Morris Ploscowe, Sex Offenses in the New Penal Law. Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 32, 1966, at 274. Ploscowe refers to the child "engag[ing] in an act of sexual intercourse." .

[46] Benjamin Karpman, "Sex Life in Prison"; Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Vol. 38, 1948, at 476. The ALI-MPC sympathizes with sex offenders. In 1955, speaking to the American Correction Association, Kinsey said "the sex offender was least likely to repeat his crime after release from prison." Just as Kinsey is the ALI authority on "normal" sexuality, psychotherapist Benjamin Karpman is an ALI authority on "abnormal" sexuality. In 1948 Karpman declares; "Criminality is a disease and criminals can be cured." He has no evidence nor does any exist after nearly half a century of testing for the efficacy of various sex offender treatment modalities. Under the common law male sexual restraint is left to self-government and the civilizing effects of marriage, wives and children.

[47] Morris Ploscowe, supra, Note 42, at 125-126.

[48] E.C.B., Jr. [only these initials appeared as author of the article.] "Pedophilia, Exhibitionism, and Voyeurism: Legal Problems in the Deviant Society." Georgia Law Review, Vol. 4, 1969, at 150.

[49] E.C.B., Jr., Georgia Law Review, Supra., Note 54 at 151,158.

[50] Orville Richardson. "Sexual Offenses Under the Proposed Missouri Criminal Code." Missouri Law Review, Vol. 38, 1973, at 372, 372.

[51] Vernon's Annotated Missouri Statutes, 2000, 544.040, Comment to 1973 Proposed Code. See also, Richardson, Id., p. 382.

[52] Judy R. Potter, Sex Offenses, Maine Law Review, Vol. 28, 1976, at 69.

[53] Charles Nemeth, "How New Jersey Prosecutors View the New Sexual Offense Statutes." New Jersey Law Journal, May 5, 1983, at 6.

[54] American Bar Association. The Probation Response to Child Sexual Abuse Offenders: How Is It Working? Executive Summary. State Justice Institute, Grant, SJI-88-11J-E-015, 1990, at 7. Another example is in Tennessee law, where the 13 member Treatment Board is instructed to provide services: "based upon the knowledge that sex offenders are extremely habituated and that there is no known cure for the propensity to commit sex abuse. The board shall develop and implement measures of success based upon a no-cure policy for intervention," Tennessee Code Section 39-13-704, from Findlaw.com.

[55] The Boston Herald Editorial, "Get Tough on Molesters," January 15, 2001. Despite overwhelming evidence of parole and treatment failure, the Boston Globe expose above reports no prison time was served by the following: 100% of those convicted of attempted child molestation; 60% convicted of criminally injuring a child; 30% convicted of indecent assault/battery of a child; 20% convicted of child rape and sodomy.

[56] Judith Reisman, "The Kinsey Effect: The FBI Uniform Crime Report Minimizes Child Sex Abuse." Crestwood, KY: Institute for Media Education, 2001. See the US DOJ National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) "Sexual Assault of Young Children as Reported to Law Enforcement: Victim, Incident, and Offender Characteristics," July 2000.

[57] Slovenko, supra. Note 50.

[58] Herbert Wechsler, The Challenge of a Model Penal Code. Harvard Law Review, Vol. 65, 1952, at 1103.

[59] "The First Measured Century" PBSTV, American Enterprise Incorporated, December 2001.

[60] reisman, supra., note 61. >these data are available in the fbi "index of crime, united states, 1960-1999, no page number, monograph cited as well as in "the reisman & johnson report," the briefing book on male sexual orientation, and "crafting gay children" all available from rsvp america, rsvpamerica.org. note that the doj reported 19,000 rapes and sexual assaults "inside school buildings or on school property" in 1999 and 12,000 in 1994. however the small doj print revealed these data are based on a sample of 10 "or less." Thus we are not using these data here.

[61] The Crime Victims Handbook, U.S. Department of Justice, 1981, Preface. (Emphasis added)

[62] Charles. F. Turner, et al., Eds., AIDS, Sexual Behavior and Intravenous Drug Use, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1989, at 79.

[63] Reisman, supra., note 61.

[64] Reisman, Ibid, Table, Index of Crime, Untied States, 1960-1999, FBI CJIS, U.S. Department of Justice, no page number. Also note that "more reporting" is not a viable reason for rape increases since post 1970 Rape Crisis Centers emerged with the influx of rape. These centers handle much of the rape volume and are prohibited from reporting their victim rapes to police.

[65] Prevent Child Abuse America "Fact Sheet: Sexual Abuse of Children," 1995-2002; preventchildabuse.org. US Department of Health and Human Services, "Study of National Incidence and Prevalence of Child Abuse and Neglect: 1988," pp.. 3-15. [Emphasis added.] HHS News, "HHS Reports New Child Abuse and Neglect Statistics," The press release says that HHS investigated "66 percent" of the 2,806,000 child abuse and neglect referrals. Of that group, "Nearly 12 percent of the victims were sexually abused" April 10, 2000, p. 2. The unconfirmed reports allegedly remained thus due to lack of HHS resources-this is the case throughout the tenure of the agency. Also see, "Trends in Child Abuse and Neglect: A National Perspective, The American Humane Association, Children's Division, Denver Colorado, 1984, p. 22, identifies "Sex Abuse statistics, p. 106, Table A-IV-16 for the early sex abuse data from 1976 to 1988. Visit the OJJDP site http://ojjdp.ncjrs.org:80/ojstatbb/excel/qa105.xls for relevant raw data. And, note that the official child sexual abuse data are highly conservative estimates since the only data reported to HHS are crimes by parents and guardians. Stranger or neighbor sex assaults are not counted in the statistical increases as these are only reported to law enforcement for their use or lack thereof. See Child Abuse and Neglect in New Jersey 1999, DOHS, Division of Youth and Family Services, at. xi.

[66] DOJ/OJJDP NIBRS research team in "The US DOJ, National Incident-Based Reporting System, (NIBRS) "Sexual Assault of Young Children as Reported to Law Enforcement: Victim, Incident, and Offender Characteristics," July 2000.

[67] Dear Dr. Reisman: According to our data, there were approximately 12,000 rapes in or around schools in 1994. In 1999 (the most recent data that we have), there were over 19,000 rapes that occurred in or around schools. This information came from the National Criminal Victimization Survey. You can access the 1994 data in the report "Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1994," http://www.ojp.usDOJ.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cvius94.pdf. Upon review by this author, while the estimate of 19,000 sex assaults may be correct, the research caveats were too loose to be cited here so I have chosen the lower estimates provided by "1999 Annual Report on School Safety" ages 12 through 18 which still excludes elementary school age children.

[68] Dr. Richard Estes, The Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children in the U. S., Canada and Mexico, (the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Montreal, supported by the U.S. Department of Justice/National Institute of Justice), the W. T. Grant Foundation and the Fund for Nonviolence. September 2001, restes@ssw.upenn.edu. (See "Crafting Gay Children").